Friday, January 06, 2006


!RECONQUISTA!



"The Southwest Border or Southwest Border region is defined as including the areas up to 150 miles north of the United States-Mexican border in the States of Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and California." Executive Order 13122, signed by the president May 25, 1999


Once again, the results of our non-existent border seems to betray our politican's intent to erase the borders and implement the NAFTA "zones."

Border Partol agents once again came under fire this past weekend. This is not uncommon, and fires exchanged with the Mexcan Army have been more and more frequent. This time, it was again trained rifle fire. You can read about it here:



The shooting of a Mexican human smuggler within the United States has even shown the impotence of our own nation to even "talk tough" about its own soveriegnty. A Border Patrol agent, being assauulted and pelted with stones by the smuggler and his associates, left the agent with little option but to shoot to protect his own life. The story may be found here:


/news/13563549.htm


Amazingly, the Mexican government protested the shooting of a Mexican national, and has not ruled out the trial in absence of an American citizen employed as a federal law enforcement officer, enforcing American law on American soil for murder. In the San Diego (California) Union Tribune on 6 January 2005, it was reported that :


that Mexico might consider a trial-in-absence of the Border Patrol officer, and he added that he believed last week's shooting death of Guillermo Martinez, 18, was caused by "a negative atmosphere" toward migrants in the United States. The Border Patrol says the shooting occurred after the migrant, who was trying to cross the border illegally, threw a large rock at the agent.


It is also a matter of public record that this same individual has been detained previously ELEVEN TIMES for the same offense by the U.S. Border Patrol. Of course, the ever racially tolerant (denote extreme sarcasm) nation of Mexico was the first to make the first and most deadly accusation that makes every politican and public official soil his pants and cry for mother: racism! Yes, the shot was fired out of close minded xenophobia and hatred!


Why not? The same charges work for American citizens against police. Why not foreigners? The same article went on to report that:

"The truth is that the negative atmosphere has unfortunately generated, has led to, this death," Derbez told reporters in Mexico City. "We have had to suffer the loss of a human life, a Mexican, for the message to get out about the effects of xenophobia, of making wrong-headed proposals," he said.


Then again, Mexican sovereignty transcends our own borders, as uttered by the mouth of former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo in Chicago during 1997:

"I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important – a very important – part of this."


He later went on to speak before the assbled members of "La Raza" (The Race), the concept that Mexican citizens will not have to give up Mexican citizenship to gain United States citizenship:

"For this reason, my government proposed a constitutional amendment to allow any Mexican with the right and the desire to acquire another nationality to do so without being forced to first give up his or her Mexican nationality."


Steven Archer, in an interview with Glenn Spence of Voice of Citizens Together, reported in NewsMax on June 7 2000 that:

Spencer added he believed Mexico is allowing this so that those people with dual citizenship may vote in the interest of Mexico in the United States. The ultimate goal of this invasion, Spencer contends, is to reclaim the American Southwest – an area including California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and parts of Colorado and Texas. Known as Aztlan by Hispanic activists, these states make up what used to be Mexican territory before treaties and wars gave the land to the United States.



In 2006, not much has changed. Yes, we have elected a new president to secure our borders, and there even exists a new president in Mexico. But the same drama exists: open borders, out of control illegals, an ever more burdened public health care, education, and public assistance system, and growing crime. Even Mexican President Vincinte Fox shouts the same "reconquista" tripe that his predecessor did. There is even an agency in the Mexican government that assists would be illegals trough education in how to get in the U.S. illegally, how to avoid deportation, and what to do if you get caught.



In 2000, we elected a President who claimed that he would control the borders. He didn't. We threw out one party, because they sold out our soveriegnty to the UN and for their own self interests. The current party at least tries to defend the nation AFTER it gets attacked, but allows the invasion of the U.S. from Mexico to continue to please international corporate interests who have no loyalty to nation.


So far, no one is even willing to admit that Mexico is a corrupt nation who most certainly does not have our best interests at heart. Ask any Texan high school student that makes a "road trip" south of the border. Like it or not, we are not even willing to deal with an issue that is literally destroying the country.


Call it xenophobia. Call it racism. Call it whatever you like. Real immigrants to this country seek to become part of the greater American society, not consider themselves Mexicans living in America. This has been the case for every "wave" of immigrants to this nation, that is, until now.


Yes, there are folks in polictical circles who see this as a golden opportunity to empower themselves, by exploitation of these folks and through telling newcomers to our shores that the deck is stacked against you from the get-go, that you are oppressed, and that if you want improvements, just do what we ask.


Don't believe me? Just ask a resident of NC, where a bill was killed by the governor to give reduced tuition to children of illegal aliens living in NC. The politician who actually sponsored this (who runs a fencing buisiness, by the way), states that this is a really "good" idea, but can't articulate how. The same goes for the concept of ID's and temporary drivers licenses issued to illegals.


The real reason? Good old fashioned racial politics from the Left. In the true false sense of noblesse-oblige by our self annointed betters, they understand that there are more Hispanics in America that African Americans. This equates to "more votes." It's so transparent, Ray Charles could see through it.


Their conceit and racist mentalities betray them: They pander to illegal aliens as being the "Hispanic Community," as they ignore the millions of Hispanic Americans who are citizens, who obey the law, live good lives, and hurt no one.


This is nothing new. Any drug dealer, armed robber, or thug is the "Black Community" in their eyes. Such high hopes for those less "fortunate," eh?


The only way to stop this mess is the enforcement of the rule of law over the political careers of public officials, who are willing to pimp the citizens of this nation out in a heartbeat! The President is the commander in chief of the armed forces, and could place the Army and Marine Corps along the border at any given time.


There are volunteers willing...and doing...just that. They are doing border security detail for nothing, taking their own time and resources to defend their country. THAT is the constitutional definition of "militia." Oh, about half of these guys are Hispanic, despite La Raza's concerns. Their allegience is to their home, not the corrupt bandit nation of Mexico.


The problem is, that just ain't going to happen, with both "Party A" and "Party Not Quite A" in our political system. We need a challenger who is willing to stand up for the Constitution and the rule of law. Or else, we face being carried away as Israel did in Old Testament times by her lawlessness.


Anyone ready to vote Libertarian, yet? At least while there is still a United States in which to do it?